海边的曼彻斯特

颜值逆袭！玩家总结G胖多年变化：一年一个样_我的网站

一 |     由你来说：那个陪伴 PC 玩家十几年、以圆润富态形象出圈的 G 胖，居然瘦到快让人认不出了？在 DOTA2 2026 国际邀请赛的开幕致辞视频里，V 社创始人加布・纽维尔的全新形象直接炸翻了全球玩家社区。    

    China US Photo:VCGAmerican scientists have voiced opposition to a proposed rule which seeks to ban federal funding for US science collaboration with China, saying that it would instead hurt US interest, the Washington Post reported on Tuesday. Chinese experts also warned that the slew of US restrictions on China-US scientific cooperation is unlikely to deal a fatal blow to China's scientific development, but could instead backfire on the US.
The proposed Office of Management and Budget (OMB) rule, set to take effect in December, would mark one of the biggest overhauls of US science funding in decades, giving political appointees greater authority over grant awards previously guided by scientific peer review and requiring that they "advance the President's policy priorities," according to the Washington Post. 
It would also effectively expand the 2011 Wolf Amendment, which bars scientists from using NASA funding for bilateral collaborations with China, to all federal agencies and scientists receiving federal funds, marking the largest break in US-China scientific engagement in decades, the US media outlet reported.
So far, the proposed rule has garnered nearly half a million public comments, many from scientists and leading US science bodies. A Washington Post analysis of 50,000 of those comments found that around 88 percent were negative.
The rule, initially set to take effect in October, was pushed back to December after a bipartisan stopgap funding bill temporarily halted its adoption. Unlike the Wolf Amendment, the rule does not require congressional approval to take effect.
"I do think there are still members of Congress who think we have a monopoly on knowledge. They think we're still in the Cold War Soviet era ... where we were ahead in most areas of science and technology. That is not the case with China. We are no longer the leader in many areas of science," said Tobin Smith, senior vice president for government relations and public policy at the Association for American Universities, which advocates on behalf of leading US research universities, per the Washington Post.
Scientists warn that the rule risks subjecting long-term scientific research to four-year political cycles. "We will not succeed if with every new administration we are ping-ponging back and forth about priorities," the American Association for the Advancement of Science said in a blistering comment, urging the administration to withdraw the rule. "Fast-tracking such profound changes ... hands an easy victory to nations like China," it said, the Washington Post reported.
This reflects a fundamental divide between the US government and the scientific community over how science should develop, Wang Yiwei, a professor at Renmin University of China's School of International Studies, told the Global Times. He noted that politicians tend to believe that suppressing China as a competitor would allow the US to preserve its market dominance and technological edge. 
Scientists, however, tend to follow a different logic, as scientific progress depends on openness, exchanges and collaboration. If science and technology are driven solely by competition and private capital, with the ultimate goal of maintaining technological monopolies, this could create greater risks and ultimately undermine US interests as well, Wang said. 
The proposed rule change is the latest salvo in a broader battle in Washington over how to respond to China's rise as a scientific superpower. In July, the US National Science Foundation (NSF) also moved to ban collaborations between scientist it funds and many Chinese research institutions and their employees, according to Science magazine. 
Liu Shaoshan, director of the Center for Embodied AI at the Shenzhen Institute of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics for Society and a former US-based researcher, told the Global Times in a previous interview that the NSF's new proposed rules created a "talent wall," arguing that restrictions based on nationality, institutional affiliation, and research partnerships could reduce the global talent pool available to the US, weaken its ability to attract leading scientists, and slow scientific innovation. 
Liu also said scientific advancement relies not only on discovery but also on the exchange, validation, and dissemination of knowledge.
Wang also said China has built significant strengths through its vast pool of scientists and engineers, complete industrial chains and massive application scenarios, while increasingly moving from application-oriented innovation toward original research. Against this backdrop, US technological blockades and restrictions on cooperation are unlikely to halt China's progress, but could instead isolate American scientists from China's latest research and collaboration opportunities. Such an approach could also prevent the two countries from leveraging their respective strengths and ultimately undermine US competitiveness, Wang said.
。轮廓分明的脸型、干练的气质，让无数玩家直呼撞脸休・杰克曼，调侃再瘦下去就能直接出演金刚狼。从全民熟知的 G 胖到颜值逆袭，这波外形巨变到底炸出了多少玩家的脑洞？事情的起因是 TI2026 开幕式上的例行致辞视频。作为 DOTA2 国际邀请赛延续多年的传统环节，G 胖每年都会录制视频向选手与全球玩家致意，往年大家的注意力都集中在赛事爆料和新作消息上，今年全场目光却全被他的外形变化抢走。    64 岁的加布・纽维尔不仅体重下降明显，脸型轮廓变得棱角分明，连发型、胡须都打理得更加利落，整个人的精神状态和气质和以往反差极强。

二 | 相关画面传到 Reddit Steam 社区后迅速登顶热门，楼主仅配文 “时光飞逝”，评论区却彻底跑偏成了大型玩梗现场。玩梗整活派的玩家迅速占领评论区，把 “撞脸休・杰克曼” 的梗玩出了五花八门的花样。不少玩家第一眼看到画面就直呼串戏，表示瘦下来的 G 胖无论是下颌线轮廓还是花白胡须的质感，都和饰演金刚狼的休・杰克曼高度相似，调侃这是 “狼叔退休后转行操盘 Steam 了”。

三 | 有人给 G 胖起了新外号 “Chad Gabe”（猛男加布）。    但也有不少玩家没忙着玩梗，反而更关心 G 胖的健康状态。他们表示，加布的体重变化不是一蹴而就的，从 2024 年开始就有明显的减重趋势，几乎每年 TI 露面都会瘦一圈，作为年过六十的行业从业者，主动管理身材、改善健康状态是实打实的好事。有高赞玩家留言说 “很高兴他瘦了这么多，大概又能多陪玩家 10 到 15 年”。在很多老玩家心里，G 胖早就不只是一个商业公司的创始人，更是整个 PC 游戏时代的标志性符号，只要他状态在线，Steam 和 V 社的作品就始终有盼头。玩家们对 G 胖外形的热烈讨论，本质上是藏在玩梗背后的情怀。大家嘴上天天吐槽 Steam 的折扣套路、调侃 “G 胖不会数三”，心里其实早就把这个熟悉的形象，当成了自己游戏青春里的一部分。从圆润的 “G 胖” 到干练的新版形象，变化的是外形，不变的是玩家们对 V 社、对 Steam 的复杂感情。玩梗归玩梗，更多人还是希望这位游戏圈的传奇人物能保持健康，继续带着玩家们期待的作品走下去。

四 |     你觉得瘦下来的 G 胖有休・杰克曼那味儿吗？你最希望 G 胖接下来兑现哪个 “有生之年” 系列游戏？欢迎在评论区说说你的看法。本文由游民星空制作发布，未经允许禁止转载。

Current article:http://uo7oh.shangfochengcongshuaizhuang.buzz/list_oqc/4xd7t.html

Published on:04:05:12